FacebookTwitter
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT US
Top Bar Menu
 
Hussman Institute for AutismHussman Institute for Autism
Hussman Institute for Autism
Advancing Discovery. Embracing Differences. Enabling Communication. Presuming Ability.
  • Home
  • Our Research
    • Program on Neuroscience
      • Autism and Brain Development Laboratory: Migration
      • Autism Neurocircuitry Laboratory: Neurochemistry
      • Human Stem Cell Neurophysiology Laboratory
      • Neural Circuit Development Laboratory: Adhesion
      • Neuronal Connectivity Laboratory: Cytoskeleton
      • Laboratory of Neural Circuits & Behavior: Electrophysiology
    • Program on Supports
      • Augmentative & Alternative Communication
      • Positive Behavior Supports
      • Communication and Inclusion
  • Our People
  • Programs & Events
  • TRANSLATE Blog
  • Resources
    • Recommended Reading
  • About the Institute
Menu back  

Traditional and supported employment present diverse challenges to adults with autism

February 25, 2016External Research, SupportsBy Sarah Hansen
Print Friendly, PDF & EmailPrint Friendly

A new study finds that adults with autism in supported employment report fewer communication problems, use more active coping strategies, and have higher “self-efficacy”—their personal judgment of their own capabilities—compared to those in unsupported employment.

career ideas colorfulThe new research, from the Freie Universität Berlin, surveyed 66 German, employed adults on the autism spectrum ages 22 to 55. Forty-nine (36 females, 12 males, 1 other) were employed in non-autism-specific employment (NASE), involving regular jobs without support. Seventeen (all male) were employed in autism-specific employment (ASE) at one IT company, with work activities linked to specific skills demonstrated by the employees with autism.

Participants reported employment challenges that fell into three primary categories: social, job demands, and “formalities” (e.g. work environment, application process), and solutions that fell into two: intrinsic or external. Those in ASE reported fewer total challenges and social challenges than they expected, but more problems with the work environment/routine and application process. In contrast, participants in NASE reported having more challenges than expected overall. In particular, communication, work equipment/environment and routine, job demands, and supervisor challenges all occurred more often than expected. These findings suggest that employed individuals on the autism spectrum face different barriers and challenges depending on their type of employment.

The study also addressed how the participants dealt with employment challenges. The research team found that the ASE group was more likely to solve problems with tactics such as communication, acceptance, and practice and/or gaining further qualifications. Those in NASE were more likely to exhibit resignation or seek external help from the work environment. The authors referred to these strategies as “active coping” versus “avoidance coping.” Overall, the ASE group also solved slightly more of their total problems than the NASE group did.

The individuals in ASE reported higher self-efficacy overall. Self-efficacy is influenced by experiences of mastery and “verbal persuasion,” such as a colleague or supervisor expressing belief in the individual’s ability to complete a task. Mastery and verbal persuasion may occur more often in an ASE environment. However, this study only demonstrates correlation: It is impossible to say whether active coping leads to greater feelings of self-efficacy, or if those with greater self-efficacy are more likely to employ active coping strategies. One idea the authors propose is that the ASE environment may better facilitate and reinforce active coping strategies for its employees, making them more likely to use them again.

Males reported slightly higher self-efficacy than females, but the authors are quick to point out that all the females surveyed were in NASE. That placement could have been more challenging and resulted in a lower self-efficacy rating, rather than gender per se.

The results are complicated by the finding that individuals in both ASE and NASE experienced equivalent levels of overall life satisfaction, which might be a result of the large number of challenges for both groups. It could also relate to how important people’s jobs are for their overall life satisfaction.

Although the ASE group reported higher self-efficacy than the NASE group, both groups fell significantly below average self-efficacy for neurotypicals, which is of major concern. Exploring the reasons behind these discrepancies and working to change them should be a focus of future research.

Also, it’s important to remember that the study participants had already successfully navigated the employment process. According to an estimate from the United Nations, only about one-fifth of adults on the autism spectrum are employed. Inclusion and contribution to the community are critical for life-satisfaction for adults with autism (TRANSLATE 12/31/2015), so it’s reasonable to suspect that average self-efficacy for unemployed individuals with autism might be even lower.

This study illuminates the different challenges that employed adults on the autism spectrum face in different types of employment, and shows that ASE correlates with higher reported self-efficacy and active coping strategies. The authors encouraged future work to help individuals with autism identify their strengths and develop positive coping behaviors in the workplace.

But successful employment for individuals with autism is not the sole responsibility of those with autism. Employers can supply greater structure and provide quiet work spaces to reduce disturbing sensory stimuli for employees on the spectrum. Understanding each individual’s needs and accommodating them will improve the work experience and performance of individuals with autism, as well. The authors promote the idea that employment should focus on enhancing employees’ strengths (rather than eliminating deficits) and fostering positive self-efficacy. And employers take note—these practices aren’t only valid for individuals on the spectrum. They can improve productivity and the mental well-being of all workers.

 

Reference:

Lorenz T, Frischling C, Cuadros R & Heinitz K. (2016). Autism and overcoming job barriers: Comparing job-related barriers and possible solution in and outside of autism-specific employment. PLOS One, 11(1):e0147040.

Image:

Used under Creative Commons License 2.0 from Nestlé

About the author

Sarah Hansen

Sarah Hansen is the Communications Associate at the Hussman Institute for Autism. She works to share the Institute's research and programs with families, educators, and anyone else interested in learning more about how to support individuals with autism. She holds a Master of Science in Biological Sciences from University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) and Master of Arts in Teaching and Bachelor of Science degrees from Cornell University. Before joining the Hussman Institute, she taught middle and upper school science at the Holton-Arms School in Bethesda, MD.

Related posts
Autism Kit for First Responders
April 21, 2022
Supporting Students with Special Needs: Online Training Modules for School-Based Professionals who Support Students with Disabilities
April 16, 2019
Young adults with autism increase empathic communication with training
March 24, 2016
Seeing things differently: Altered GABA signaling at play in autistic visual perception
March 10, 2016
Evidence sensory differences are related to communication challenges in children with autism
March 3, 2016
Chinese meditation practice improves memory and functional connectivity in children with autism
February 18, 2016
  • “The soul must be loved as it is.”

    Jamie Burke
  • “Autism awareness can’t stop with a list of what makes people with autism different from us. Because what is essential is the constant awareness of what makes us the same.”

    John P. Hussman, Ph.D., Director
  • “And now here is my secret, a very simple secret: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.”

    The Little Prince

    Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
  • “We agree with the view that presuming competence is the least dangerous assumption.”

    John P. Hussman, Ph.D., Director
  • “Autism is not disability.”

    Jamie Burke
  • “We are just like you, with the same desires, and just need help to be typical members of society.”

    Sue Rubin
  • “In the end, the best argument for inclusion is the simplest. It’s the one we know by heart – that all of us are created equal.”

    John P. Hussman, Ph.D., Director
Subscribe & Stay Informed
Recent Activity:
  • Autism Kit for First Responders
    April 21, 2022
  • Supporting Students with Special Needs: Online Training Modules for School-Based Professionals who Support Students with Disabilities
    April 16, 2019
  • Parental optimism, school inclusion may affect long-term progress of individuals with autism
    April 12, 2016
  • Young adults with autism increase empathic communication with training
    March 24, 2016
Contact

  • follow us:

Administration & Program on Autism Supports
Hussman Institute for Autism
6021 University Blvd, Ste 490
Ellicott City, MD 21043
Phone 443-860-2580 | Email info@hussmanautism.org

Research Laboratories
Hussman Institute for Autism
1011 Sunnybrook Road, Ninth Floor
Miami, FL 33136
(3 blocks from the Hussman Institute for Human Genomics)
Phone 443-860-2580 | Email info@hussmanautism.org

site development by

© 2013 - 2017 Hussman Institute for Autism