FacebookTwitter
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT US
Top Bar Menu
 
Hussman Institute for AutismHussman Institute for Autism
Hussman Institute for Autism
Advancing Discovery. Embracing Differences. Enabling Communication. Presuming Ability.
  • Home
  • Our Research
    • Program on Neuroscience
      • Autism and Brain Development Laboratory: Migration
      • Autism Neurocircuitry Laboratory: Neurochemistry
      • Human Stem Cell Neurophysiology Laboratory
      • Neural Circuit Development Laboratory: Adhesion
      • Neuronal Connectivity Laboratory: Cytoskeleton
      • Laboratory of Neural Circuits & Behavior: Electrophysiology
    • Program on Supports
      • Augmentative & Alternative Communication
      • Positive Behavior Supports
      • Communication and Inclusion
  • Our People
  • Programs & Events
  • TRANSLATE Blog
  • Resources
    • Recommended Reading
  • About the Institute
Menu back  

Social interaction is a two-way street: How well do neurotypicals interpret behavior of individuals with autism?

January 7, 2016External Research, SupportsBy Sarah Hansen
Print Friendly, PDF & EmailPrint Friendly

Instead of investigating the ability of individuals on the autism spectrum to identify emotions, a new study takes a different approach: how well can neurotypical adults interpret the behavior of adults with autism?

Can neurotypicals determine what type of situation people are experiencing based on their reactions alone?

A Dr. Elizabeth Sheppard and colleagues from the University of Nottingham hypothesized that neurotypicals would have a harder time interpreting behavior of individuals with autism, and their first study supported the hypothesis. The researchers showed 30 neurotypical adults muted video of 40 individuals—half with autism and half without—responding to four situations: being kept waiting, listening to a story, hearing a joke, and being complimented. The participants knew the four situations and identified to which they thought the person in the video was responding, without knowing whether he or she was neurotypical or on the autism spectrum.

The participants were significantly better at identifying the correct situation that elicited the response for neurotypicals than for autistic individuals in the waiting, story, and compliment situations. The participants identified responses to the joke equally well for both groups.

This result contrasts with previous work that showed that the emotions of individuals with ASC were easier to identify than those of neurotypicals. However, a critical difference between these two studies exists. The previous study by Faso et al. (2015) elicited specific emotions from recorded participants by replaying descriptions of events in each of their lives. The current study provided the same events to all participants (joke, story, etc.). Individuals with autism may have different emotional responses than neurotypicals to the same situations, making it harder for neurotypicals to identify the antecedent of various reactions among individuals with autism. Further research could examine how individuals with autism respond to receiving a compliment, for example.

Are there differences in the overall expressiveness of neuortypicals and those on the autism spectrum?

If the individuals with autism were less expressive overall, that would also make it harder to identify the causative event. The authors cited mixed evidence to support that possibility and decided to run a second study to address it. In the second study, new participants watched the same muted videos. Instead of identifying what situation had preceded each recording, they simply rated the responses on a seven-point scale from least to most expressive, without knowing any of the individuals were on the autism spectrum.

The results indicated that as rated by neurotypicals, there was no significant difference between the expressiveness of individuals with and without autism in three of the four situations. Participants deemed the individuals with autism slightly less expressive when given compliments.

How do neurotypicals describe behavioral responses of individuals with and without autism?

These results implied that something other than overall expressiveness might have affected the ability of neurotypicals to identify what situation the individuals with autism were responding to in the first study. So, the authors ran a third study where new neurotypical participants were asked to describe in their own words the responses they observed in the same muted videos, without any other information. The researchers organized the descriptions into three categories: internal states (e.g. “he’s nervous” or “she’s in a good mood”), overt behavior (e.g. “he raised an eyebrow” or “she’s laughing”), and events (e.g. “someone told a joke” or “someone complimented her”). The participants used overt behavior and event descriptions equally to describe the individuals with and without autism. However, they described the internal states of individuals with autism more often than of those without.

While this result surprised the authors at first, they cited research showing that a) in any situation, neurotypical adults tend to explain behavior by describing possible associated mental states, and b) neurotypical adults tend to engage in “effortful mentalizing” (trying to imagine what could be going on) in highly ambiguous situations. So, if the neurotypical participants found the responses of individuals with autism confusing or ambiguous, they would be more likely to try to explain them by guessing at their internal mental state.

Social interaction is a two-way street

The authors of this paper recognize that social interaction and relationship-building are two-way streets. Individuals with autism already encounter social challenges; to be frequently misunderstood by neurotypicals only makes interaction more difficult. Having neurotypical individuals who understand those with autism is just as important as teaching individuals with autism to understand neurotypicals.

Further research could aim to support neurotypicals in interpreting the emotional responses and facial expressions of individuals with autism, possibly patterned after tools that are currently used to identify the underlying function of behaviors in non-verbal individuals with autism.

While it’s crucial that individuals with autism get support to develop their social skills, it might also help if neurotypicals learned how to better understand the different, but equally valid and expressive, responses of individuals with autism. As autism advocate Temple Grandin famously said, autism means “different, not less.”

 

Reference:

Sheppard E, Pillai D, Wong GT, Ropar D & Mitchell P. (2015). How easy is it to read the minds of people with autism spectrum disorder?. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-015-2662-8.

About the author

Sarah Hansen

Sarah Hansen is the Communications Associate at the Hussman Institute for Autism. She works to share the Institute's research and programs with families, educators, and anyone else interested in learning more about how to support individuals with autism. She holds a Master of Science in Biological Sciences from University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) and Master of Arts in Teaching and Bachelor of Science degrees from Cornell University. Before joining the Hussman Institute, she taught middle and upper school science at the Holton-Arms School in Bethesda, MD.

Related posts
Autism Kit for First Responders
April 21, 2022
Supporting Students with Special Needs: Online Training Modules for School-Based Professionals who Support Students with Disabilities
April 16, 2019
Young adults with autism increase empathic communication with training
March 24, 2016
Seeing things differently: Altered GABA signaling at play in autistic visual perception
March 10, 2016
Evidence sensory differences are related to communication challenges in children with autism
March 3, 2016
Traditional and supported employment present diverse challenges to adults with autism
February 25, 2016
  • “The soul must be loved as it is.”

    Jamie Burke
  • “Autism awareness can’t stop with a list of what makes people with autism different from us. Because what is essential is the constant awareness of what makes us the same.”

    John P. Hussman, Ph.D., Director
  • “And now here is my secret, a very simple secret: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.”

    The Little Prince

    Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
  • “We agree with the view that presuming competence is the least dangerous assumption.”

    John P. Hussman, Ph.D., Director
  • “Autism is not disability.”

    Jamie Burke
  • “We are just like you, with the same desires, and just need help to be typical members of society.”

    Sue Rubin
  • “In the end, the best argument for inclusion is the simplest. It’s the one we know by heart – that all of us are created equal.”

    John P. Hussman, Ph.D., Director
Subscribe & Stay Informed
Recent Activity:
  • Autism Kit for First Responders
    April 21, 2022
  • Supporting Students with Special Needs: Online Training Modules for School-Based Professionals who Support Students with Disabilities
    April 16, 2019
  • Parental optimism, school inclusion may affect long-term progress of individuals with autism
    April 12, 2016
  • Young adults with autism increase empathic communication with training
    March 24, 2016
Contact

  • follow us:

Administration & Program on Autism Supports
Hussman Institute for Autism
6021 University Blvd, Ste 490
Ellicott City, MD 21043
Phone 443-860-2580 | Email info@hussmanautism.org

Research Laboratories
Hussman Institute for Autism
1011 Sunnybrook Road, Ninth Floor
Miami, FL 33136
(3 blocks from the Hussman Institute for Human Genomics)
Phone 443-860-2580 | Email info@hussmanautism.org

site development by

© 2013 - 2017 Hussman Institute for Autism